[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-16049: UPGRADE-1.6.txt doesn't mention insecure=very/yes removal
Reporter:Stuart Henderson (stuarth)Labels:
Date Opened:2010-05-04 09:37:50Date Closed:2010-05-07 11:08:29
Priority:MajorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Documentation
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:
Description:The previously-deprecated insecure=very and insecure=yes options have been removed but this isn't mentioned in UPGRADE-1.6.txt
Comments:By: Paul Belanger (pabelanger) 2010-05-04 10:33:50

Are you able to provide a patch?
By: Stuart Henderson (stuarth) 2010-05-04 14:43:07

There's a patch here if you can use it.

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/telephony/asterisk/patches/patch-UPGRADE-1_6_txt?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup

By the way I marked this as major as insecure=very is in sample configs all over the net and as port maintainer I've heard from a few people ran into this problem.
By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2010-05-07 11:07:10

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 261867

U   trunk/UPGRADE-1.6.txt

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r261867 | lmadsen | 2010-05-07 11:05:24 -0500 (Fri, 07 May 2010) | 6 lines

Update UPGRADE-1.6.txt stating insecure=very has been removed.

(closes issue ASTERISK-16049)
Reported by: stuarth
Tested by: stuarth

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=261867
By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2010-05-07 11:08:29

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 261868

_U  branches/1.6.2/
U   branches/1.6.2/UPGRADE-1.6.txt

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r261868 | lmadsen | 2010-05-07 11:08:29 -0500 (Fri, 07 May 2010) | 13 lines

Merged revisions 261867 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk

........
 r261867 | lmadsen | 2010-05-07 11:05:24 -0500 (Fri, 07 May 2010) | 6 lines
 
 Update UPGRADE-1.6.txt stating insecure=very has been removed.
 
 (closes issue ASTERISK-16049)
 Reported by: stuarth
 Tested by: stuarth
........

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=261868