[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-17205: [patch] Using 'asterisk -r' no longer displays welcome_message
Reporter:Paul Belanger (pabelanger)Labels:
Date Opened:2011-01-05 12:30:28.000-0600Date Closed:2011-02-08 15:24:58.000-0600
Priority:MinorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Core/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:( 0) welcome.patch
Description:This was reported to the asterisk-dev mailing list a few months ago.  It looks to be a regression as a result of https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/915/.

I reverted some of the logic, but not sure it is the correct solution

****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ******

http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2010-October/046657.html
Comments:By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2011-02-08 15:24:03.000-0600

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 307092

U   branches/1.8/main/logger.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r307092 | qwell | 2011-02-08 15:24:03 -0600 (Tue, 08 Feb 2011) | 9 lines

Fix issue with verbose messages not showing on remote console.

This code was reworked recently, and since the logchannel list hadn't been
created yet at this point, and it was a verbose message, it was being dropped
on the floor.  Now it'll continue on to where it should be handled.

(closes issue ASTERISK-17205)
Reported by: pabelanger

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=307092
By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2011-02-08 15:24:58.000-0600

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 307097

_U  trunk/
U   trunk/main/logger.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r307097 | qwell | 2011-02-08 15:24:57 -0600 (Tue, 08 Feb 2011) | 16 lines

Merged revisions 307092 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8

........
 r307092 | qwell | 2011-02-08 15:24:01 -0600 (Tue, 08 Feb 2011) | 9 lines
 
 Fix issue with verbose messages not showing on remote console.
 
 This code was reworked recently, and since the logchannel list hadn't been
 created yet at this point, and it was a verbose message, it was being dropped
 on the floor.  Now it'll continue on to where it should be handled.
 
 (closes issue ASTERISK-17205)
 Reported by: pabelanger
........

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=307097