| Summary: | ASTERISK-20673: Embeded decode SIP-T/SIP-I | ||
| Reporter: | Joherman (joherman) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2012-11-09 18:30:25.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2012-11-12 18:16:13.000-0600 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability |
| Versions: | 11.0.1 | Frequency of Occurrence | |
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) chan_sip.diff ( 1) sip_isup.tar.gz | |
| Description: | Create support SIP-T/SIP-I | ||
| Comments: | By: Joherman (joherman) 2012-11-11 01:05:09.210-0600 diff file By: Joherman (joherman) 2012-11-11 01:05:45.103-0600 isup header file By: Joherman (joherman) 2012-11-11 01:06:43.922-0600 I've embed libss7 code to decode sip isup message, need tester as sip-t/i destination. sip-t or sip-i as originating still under development. isup's variable decoded : ${satellites_in_connection}, ${continuity_check}, ${echo_control_device}, ${national_call}, ${end_to_end_method}, ${interworking}, ${end_to_end_information}, ${isup_all_the_way}, ${isup_preference}, ${isdn_access_origination}, ${sccp_method}, ${calling_party_category}, ${transmission_medium_req}, ${called_nature_of_address}, ${called_ni}, ${called_numbering_plan}, ${called_party_number}, ${coding_standard}, ${location}, ${cause_class}, ${cause_sub_class}, ${cause}, ${opt_continuity_check}, ${call_reference}, ${point_code}, ${calling_nature_of_address}, ${calling_ni}, ${calling_numbering_plan}, ${calling_presentation}, ${calling_screening}, ${calling_party_number}, ${cn_nature_of_address}, ${cn_numbering_plan}, ${charge_number}, ${ga_type_of_address}, ${ga_nature_of_address}, ${ga_odd_even}, ${ga_reserved}, ${ga_presentation}, ${ga_numbering_plan}, ${generic_address}, ${gd_type_of_digits}, ${gd_encoding_scheme}, ${generic_digits}, ${gn_type_of_name}, ${gn_available}, ${gn_presentation}, ${generic_name}, ${tns_type_of_network}, ${tns_network_id_plan}, ${tns_network_id1}, ${tns_network_id2}, ${tns_circuit_code}, ${propagation_delay_cntr}, ${bc_charge}, ${bc_called_party_status}, ${bc_called_party_category}, ${bc_end_to_end_method}, ${bc_interworking}, ${bc_end_to_end_info}, ${bc_isup}, ${bc_holding}, ${bc_isdc_acces}, ${bc_echo_control_device}, ${bc_sccp_method}, ${obc_inband}, ${obc_diversion_may_occur}, ${obc_simple_segmentation}, ${obc_mlpp_user}, ${circuit_group_supervision}, ${isup_range_status}, ${event_info}, ${oli}, ${redirecting_indicator}, ${original_redirecting_reason}, ${redirecting_counter}, ${redirecting_reason}, ${ocn_nature_of_addres}, ${ocn_numbering_plan}, ${ocn_presentation}, ${original_called_num}, ${jurisdiction_info}, ${eci_outgoing_info}, ${eci_incoming_info}, ${eci_outgoing_request}, ${eci_incoming_request}, ${cs_maintenance_blocking}, ${cs_call_processing}, ${cs_hardware_blocking}, ${lspi_type}, ${lspi_encoding_scheme}, ${lspi_context_id}, ${lspi_spare}, ${lsp_identity}, ${facility}, ${rn_nature_of_address}, ${rn_ni}, ${rn_numbering_plan}, ${rn_presentation}, ${rn_screening}, ${redirecting_number}, By: Matt Jordan (mjordan) 2012-11-12 18:16:06.618-0600 Features requests are no longer submitted to or accepted through the issue tracker. Features requests are openly discussed on the mailing lists [1] and Asterisk IRC channels and made note of by Bug Marshals. [1] http://www.asterisk.org/support/mailing-lists | ||