| Summary: | ASTERISK-21062: Pedantic should also be per extension directive | ||
| Reporter: | Raul Dias (rsd) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2013-02-09 21:14:22.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2013-02-10 15:02:24.000-0600 |
| Priority: | Trivial | Regression? | |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/General |
| Versions: | 1.8.8.2 | Frequency of Occurrence | |
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Androi SIP Clients. Tested with Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) and JellyBean (4.1), probably GB (2.3) an JB (4.2) too. | Attachments: | |
| Description: | The sip.conf global directive pedantic affects globally all SIP clients.
Android native SIP clients has a broken implementation. It seems that it fails to set the From tag on the CANCEL. With pedantic=yes, when a Android native SIP client HANGs UP, asterisk fails to detect it. With pedantic=no everything works as expected. As pedantic=no is not RFC complaint and some devices fails to work with it, it should be possible to have pedantic options in a extension config and not only globally. Otherwise a mixed environment won't be possible in a few scenaries. | ||
| Comments: | By: Michael L. Young (elguero) 2013-02-10 15:01:56.987-0600 Features requests are no longer submitted to or accepted through the issue tracker. Features requests are openly discussed on the mailing lists [1] and Asterisk IRC channels and made note of by Bug Marshals. [1] http://www.asterisk.org/support/mailing-lists If you would like to contribute a patch, it would be more then welcomed. Also, new features have to be added against trunk. By: Matt Jordan (mjordan) 2013-02-10 15:23:59.293-0600 As a follow up to Micheal's comment - this would be very difficult. Many pedantic checks occur on messages before they are associated with a peer. As such, those pedantic checks would be broken if configured on a peer by peer basis. Given that all devices communicating using SIP should be encouraging compliance as much as possible and the difficulty involved in changing the granularity of this option, I don't really think this is something that would be worth pursuing, even as an improvement or new feature. | ||