Summary:	ASTERISK-22021: Amaizing CallerID
Reporter:	Badalian Vyacheslav (slavon)	Labels:
Date Opened:	2013-07-05 09:10:00	Date Closed:	2013-07-05 09:15:17
Priority:	Major	Regression?
Status:	Closed/Complete	Components:	Channels/chan_sip/General
Versions:	1.8.21.0	Frequency of Occurrence
Related Issues:
Environment:	centos 5	Attachments:
Description:	In sip.conf we have callerid: ; 4986836333/1 [a74986836333](sip_line) username=a74986836333 secret=... callerid=4986836333 <4986836333> if i test [root@asterisk agi-bin]# asterisk  -rx "sip show peer a74986836333" | grep -i callerid  Callerid     : "4986836333" <4986836333> all is ok... but if i call in CDR, AGI, AEL func CallerID(NUM) return a74986836333 example: [root@asterisk agi-bin]# tail -n 10000 /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv | grep a74986836333 | tail -n 4 "","a74986836333","4986836299","is_pots","a74986836333","Local/4986836299@is_pots-00001c7b;2","DAHDI/i1/84986836299-28ac","Dial","DAHDI/g1/S84986836299,90,g","2013-07-05 17:40:35",,"2013-07-05 17:40:52",17,0,"NO ANSWER","DOCUMENTATION","1373031635.49893","" "","a74986836333","4986836299","output","a74986836333","SIP/a74986836333-00004959","Local/4986836299@is_pots-00001c7b;1","Dial","Local/4986836299@is_pots/n","2013-07-05 17:40:35",,"2013-07-05 17:40:52",17,0,"NO ANSWER","DOCUMENTATION","1373031635.49891","" "","a74986836333","4986836299","is_pots","a74986836333","Local/4986836299@is_pots-00001cc2;2","DAHDI/i1/84986836299-2932","Dial","DAHDI/g1/S84986836299,90,g","2013-07-05 18:05:05",,"2013-07-05 18:05:16",11,0,"NO ANSWER","DOCUMENTATION","1373033105.50467","" "","a74986836333","4986836299","output","a74986836333","SIP/a74986836333-00004a41","Local/4986836299@is_pots-00001cc2;1","Dial","Local/4986836299@is_pots/n","2013-07-05 18:05:05",,"2013-07-05 18:05:16",11,0,"NO ANSWER","DOCUMENTATION","1373033105.50465","" and [Jul  5 18:05:05] VERBOSE[28760] res_agi.c:  agi-in.pl: in/a74986836333/4986836299: CID ALL  <a74986836333> -- WHY!? This situation occurs in about 5% of phone numbers. We have a total of more than 1,000 phone numbers.
Comments:	By: Matt Jordan (mjordan) 2013-07-05 09:14:36.273-0500 Thanks for your comments. This does not appear to be a bug report and we are closing it. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it would make more sense to raise your question in the support tracker, http://www.asterisk.org/support. By: Matt Jordan (mjordan) 2013-07-05 09:15:17.913-0500 Alternatively, you may want to ask why you are seeing this behavior on the asterisk-users mailing list or on the #asterisk IRC channel.