| Summary: | ASTERISK-22632: option allowexternaldomains behavior changed between release versions | ||||
| Reporter: | Antoine (Antwone) | Labels: | |||
| Date Opened: | 2013-10-02 05:33:33 | Date Closed: | 2014-10-22 12:41:25 | ||
| Priority: | Major | Regression? | |||
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/General | ||
| Versions: | 11.5.1 | Frequency of Occurrence | |||
| Related Issues: |
| ||||
| Environment: | Centos with digium/asterisk.org repository | Attachments: | ( 0) full_NOK ( 1) full_OK ( 2) sip.conf | ||
| Description: | Hello,
It seems that the behavior of allowexternaldomains=yes change from 11.4 to 11.5.1 For example with asterisk 11.4 with sip.conf settings : ; sip domain settings autodomain = yes ; sip-to-sip security related settings allowexternaldomains = yes No problem to register from a 1.8.13 asterisk from a non local domain But with 11.5.1 with same settings : I've got in CLI : [Oct 2 09:11:46] NOTICE[2315]: chan_sip.c:27919 handle_request_register: Registration from '<sip:antoine@10.3.1.183;transport=UDP>' failed for '192.168.20.11:6060' - Not a local domain | ||||
| Comments: | By: Rusty Newton (rnewton) 2013-10-03 20:40:15.088-0500 Please attach a full, sanitized sip.conf configuration for each version, and example VERBOSE,DEBUG output (full log, see logger.conf) for both the working and non-working versions. https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Collecting+Debug+Information By: Antoine (Antwone) 2013-10-07 03:09:22.702-0500 Same sip.conf file for both servers By: Antoine (Antwone) 2013-10-07 03:10:28.336-0500 CLI and Debug for the working version (11.4) By: Antoine (Antwone) 2013-10-07 03:11:14.233-0500 CLI and Debug for the non working version (11.5.1) By: Antoine (Antwone) 2013-10-07 03:12:25.310-0500 Hello, I joined the sip.conf and the debug files. Antoine By: Antoine (Antwone) 2013-10-10 08:11:15.726-0500 Files joigned By: Rusty Newton (rnewton) 2013-10-22 19:09:14.834-0500 Didn't see this until now since the Enter Feedback or Send Back buttons were not hit. We'll take a look. Thanks for the debug and configs. By: Rusty Newton (rnewton) 2013-11-12 17:40:42.467-0600 The Server: and User-Agent: headers in your SIP responses for the full_OK trace show "Asterisk PBX 11.5.1". I'd say it was a bug if it didn't look like the same Asterisk version in use in both traces, but even still it would be odd if the configuration didn't change between the two. I'm also interested in what happens when you specify the same domains that autodomain should be setting? Can you test with specified domains, and provide an example of behavior on 11.4 as well as 11.5.1, or clarify why the full_OK trace shows Asterisk 11.5.1 as the version in use. By: Rusty Newton (rnewton) 2013-12-09 18:12:07.158-0600 Suspended due to lack of activity. Please request a bug marshal in #asterisk-bugs on the IRC network irc.freenode.net to reopen the issue should you have the additional information requested. Further information can be found at http://www.asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines By: Nathan Thomas (royalpublishing) 2014-09-03 12:07:52.853-0500 This is still a problem in version 11.12.0. If you have allowexternaldomains=yes and autodomain=yes then you receive the "Not a local domain" error message even if you have hard coded the external domain in sip.conf and said domain shows up in the CLI under "sip show domains". By: Matt Jordan (mjordan) 2014-09-04 13:57:34.838-0500 Please provide the information that Rusty requested: {quote} I'm also interested in what happens when you specify the same domains that autodomain should be setting? Can you test with specified domains, and provide an example of behavior on 11.4 as well as 11.5.1, or clarify why the full_OK trace shows Asterisk 11.5.1 as the version in use. {quote} By: Nathan Thomas (royalpublishing) 2014-09-19 16:09:42.051-0500 Sorry guys I've just been too swamped with work at my job here lately to be able to provide the feedback your requesting in a timely manner. I will try to get some testing in and hopefully have some new information for you some time next week. By: Rusty Newton (rnewton) 2014-09-19 16:37:57.351-0500 No worries - I'll set the issue back in Waiting on Feedback. Thanks for updating. By: Rusty Newton (rnewton) 2014-10-22 12:41:25.328-0500 Closing out issue as it has been a few more weeks with no response. [~royalpublishing] At this point, since the original reporter isn't responding. It may make sense just open a new issue when you get the additional debug needed. | ||||