Asterisk
  1. Asterisk
  2. ASTERISK-7086

[patch] record spooling support in cdr_addon_mysql.c

    Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Closed
    • Severity: Major Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Target Release Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Addons/cdr_mysql
    • Labels:
      None
    • SVN Revision Number:
      33482
    • Mantis ID:
      7274
    • Regression:
      No

      Description

      I am losing CDR records on my MySQL backend. I just compared CSV records
      with MySQL's and I was surprised with the difference. Searching a bit, I
      hit this bug: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4953

      Questions:

      1.- kpfleming says "The spooling issue will continue to be a problem for
      v1-0 users, but HEAD (and v1-2) users can use the built-in spooling in
      the CDR engine.". That "built-in spooling" has to be enabled somewhere
      or is it automatic?

      2.- If there is a built-in spooling into CDR itself and there is no
      spooling in cdr_addon_mysql, when the mysql server is down, crashed,
      full, unwired, firewalled, or whatever.. is built-in spooling in CDR
      itself supposed to handle that??

      I'm using asterisk-1.2.7.1 and asterisk-addons-1.2.2

      Joseph Benden's patch makes a great job spooling records, but you guys made him take out spooling support from cdr_addon_mysql because in asterisk 1.2.x CDR's built-in spooling support was going to take care of not losing records. But that's not happening right now.

        Activity

        Hide
        Juan Pablo Abuyeres added a comment -

        Juggie,

        Where can I download it from??

        Show
        Juan Pablo Abuyeres added a comment - Juggie, Where can I download it from??
        Hide
        Tilghman Lesher added a comment -

        juggie: any updates here? I see that NoLossCDR branch is out of date by about 2 months.

        Show
        Tilghman Lesher added a comment - juggie: any updates here? I see that NoLossCDR branch is out of date by about 2 months.
        Hide
        jmls added a comment -

        juggie, should we close this, or are you able to help out ?

        Show
        jmls added a comment - juggie, should we close this, or are you able to help out ?
        Hide
        Donny Kavanagh added a comment -

        Sorry all, personal life stepped in and NoLossCDR went on life support, however me and seanbright have restarted the branch and are actively working on it again as of about two-three weeks ago.

        As of right now you will find our asterisk branch on the svn in /asterisk/team/group/NoLossCDR-Redux2/

        Asterisk addons can be found @ /asterisk-addons/team/group/asterisk-addons-NoLossCDR-Redux2/

        I do apologize, but as of right now the asterisk-addons branch is simply a copy of trunk but has not progressed past that, as i have not had time to complete the changes required, test and commit. I will try to do that asap. If you would like to volonteer to test, please contact myself or seanbright on irc.

        Show
        Donny Kavanagh added a comment - Sorry all, personal life stepped in and NoLossCDR went on life support, however me and seanbright have restarted the branch and are actively working on it again as of about two-three weeks ago. As of right now you will find our asterisk branch on the svn in /asterisk/team/group/NoLossCDR-Redux2/ Asterisk addons can be found @ /asterisk-addons/team/group/asterisk-addons-NoLossCDR-Redux2/ I do apologize, but as of right now the asterisk-addons branch is simply a copy of trunk but has not progressed past that, as i have not had time to complete the changes required, test and commit. I will try to do that asap. If you would like to volonteer to test, please contact myself or seanbright on irc.
        Hide
        Jason Parker added a comment -

        With the branch that Juggie and seanbright are working on, this report doesn't really need to be open any longer, as we'll be going with that method instead.

        Show
        Jason Parker added a comment - With the branch that Juggie and seanbright are working on, this report doesn't really need to be open any longer, as we'll be going with that method instead.

          People

          • Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development